Wednesday, April 21, 2010

AKE Motion for Expert Assistance

The Ake v. Oklahoma motion for expert assistance is one of the most powerful tools at the criminal defense lawyer's disposal. Typically utilized by criminal lawyers appointed by the court, the motion is used to compel trial judges to approve funding to hire anyone from a private investigator to forensic computer expert to polygraph examiner. The beauty of this approach is two-fold. First, the defense lawyer is authorized to approach the judge ex parte, meaning without the knowledge of the state prosecutors. This allows the lawyer to reveal his defensive theories to justify the expense without the prosecutor learning about it. Second, the hired expert now becomes part of the "defense team" and is protected by the attorney's work-product privilege. This means the expert is now prohibited from revealing anything about their investigation to anyone without the client's express authorization.

There are important hoops the defense lawyer must navigate to compel judges to approve funding. The lawyer must first show the defendant is indigent and cannot afford to hire an expert on their own. The lawyer must also show the need for the expert involves some "significant factor" at the guilt/innocence or punishment phase of trial. This usually means the expert will be needed to develop certain types of evidence used in rebuttal or used to challenge the prosecutor's case. At times, the defense lawyer might need to demonstrate the legal admissibility of the evidence they are attempting to develop through the expert.

Next, the lawyer must present the expert's qualifications. This takes the form of a resume or vita. The judge will also need an estimate of the fees and expenses anticipated. I typically use the letter sent to me by the expert setting forth the proposed work, including trial testimony.

Lastly, the lawyer must state that neither he, nor his client, is sufficiently knowledgeable in the area of expertise for which they need assistance. I suppose if a lawyer was trained in forensic child psychology, the lawyer could serve as his own expert in a child abuse case. Sounds pretty silly, but still one of the necessary hoops we need to jump through.

Brazos County judges are usually very cooperative in granting funding when I apply. They might quibble over the cost at times, and sometimes I'll need to convince my expert to work for a bit less, but usually I get exactly what I ask for. Then, with the funding in hand for my expert of choice, I feel more confident in providing my clients with an effective defense.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

MY HUSABAND HAD A DISAGREEMENT WITH HIS SISTER AND PUSHED HER AND HE WAS ARRESTED. ABOUT A WEEK LATER HIS SISTER SIGNED AN AFFIDAVIT TO DROP THE CHARGES. MY HUSBANDS ATTY STATE HE TURNED IT OVER TO THE DA AND STATED THAT HE WANTS TO TALK TO THE SISTER. DOES SHE NEED TO RESPONSE TO THE DA. AND IF SHE DOES NOT CAN SHE GET IN TROUBLE.

Stephen Gustitis said...

Please discuss this strategy with the lawyer working the case. They are in the best position to properly answer your question. Thanks for your comment.

Anonymous said...

Are you a talented attorney or just an "okay" attorney?

Stephen Gustitis said...

What's your criteria for talent? One person's talent is another person's okay. Thanks for the poignant question.